
Posted: 4th January 2026
Microsoft wants to resurrect Three Mile Island. It will never happen.
Microsoft and Constellation Energy have spent the last year trying to
resurrect the Three Mile Island Nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. The
plant shut down in 2019 under economic pressure, after a separate part of
the facility was decommissioned following a partial meltdown in 1979. The
effort is laudable, especially in light of Microsoft’s rapidly rising
demand for clean energy to fuel its artificial intelligence data centers.
Unfortunately, it will never work. A fully shut-down nuclear plant has
never been restarted in America for good reason: There are too many
regulatory, material and logistical hurdles to overcome. So far,
Constellation Energy has painted a rosy picture. It originally stated the
plant would be back online by 2028. Then, in early 2025, it revised its
estimated opening date to 2027 following various inspections and the
restoration of the plant’s water systems. But traditional nuclear
projects have a long history of going over budget and past schedule. A big
factor is that the U.S. regulatory environment is not friendly to
traditional nuclear power. As the former head of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission in the first Trump administration, I have seen
firsthand how red tape can choke even the best-intentioned projects under
goodwill regulators. Reactors that were permanently shut down must go
through an extensive regulatory review process and request special
exemptions for both their operations and use of radioactive fuel.
Constellation Energy and Microsoft have some solace in that the Department
of Energy offered their project public support. But the Department of
Energy isn’t the only player in town. To ensure safety, Three Mile Island
will also have to pass rigorous rounds of inspections, receive
environmental approval and get the green light from the likes of the
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
FERC and other state and local offices. Even under a pro-business,
pro-energy, regulation-slashing Trump administration, this is quite a
gauntlet — especially because pro-nuclear government officials may
nevertheless be hemmed in by existing laws and review processes outside of
their control. If regulatory barriers were the only holdup, perhaps there
would be reasons to be more bullish on Three Mile Island. After all,
President Trump has offered full support to nuclear energy and is committed
to winning the energy-intensive AI race against China, red tape or not. But
regulatory barriers are just the start. Nuclear reactors can’t be simply
switched back on like a light bulb. They’re more like a car left undriven
in a garage for too long with old oil, putrid gasoline, rat-chewed wires
and a rusty frame — except that nuclear plants are infinitely more
complicated than any car.
The Hill 2nd Jan 2026